Latest news with #Sir Keir Starmer
Sky News
6 hours ago
- Politics
- Sky News
Five reasons to be confused by Starmer's MP suspensions
I'm going to level with you - I am very, very confused. In fact, I've got five reasons why I'm very confused. The first reason I'm confused is because this is meant to be a show of strength, but most people have literally never heard of these four individuals. Rachael Maskell is a bit well-known, but if this is intended to impress the public, then I'm not sure the public will notice. Secondly, if it's about installing discipline in the parliamentary Labour Party, I'm confused about that. Surely Sir Keir Starmer 's aim right now should be to unite the parliamentary Labour Party rather than divide it. After the welfare rebellion, the promise was to listen. Starmer gave interviews saying he was going to create policy more sympathetic to his party. This is the opposite approach. The third reason I'm confused is because they've been suspended in part for their role in the welfare rebellion that forced the government into its U-turn. It was only yesterday morning that Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the government's welfare reforms were in the "right place" - yet the people who helped get them there are suspended. Suspended for agreeing with what is now government policy is an odd look. 5:27 Fourth, I'm confused at who the most prominent individual to be suspended is - Rachael Maskell. She was on Sky News within minutes of the suspension looking genuinely surprised and really rather upset. Now, there's absolutely no doubt she was a ringleader in this rebellion. Eight days ago, she authored an article in the New Statesman discussing how to organise a government rebellion - so I think that's pretty much case closed. But Rachael is of the soft left, not the hard left. And who else is on the soft left? It's Starmer. It does feel as if the prime minister is slightly coming for people who have dangerously similar views to him. I understand this is all about drawing hard lines and showing who's on your team and who isn't. But some of that line looks like it goes awfully close to people that you really wouldn't want to be on the wrong side of if you're prime minister. And finally, three other MPs - Rosena Allin-Khan, Bell Ribeiro-Addy and Mohammed Yasin - have been sacked from their trade envoy jobs. They do retain the party whip. But here's the thing that hurts your head: if you are a Lib Dem trade envoy, like Sarah Olney, or if you're a Tory trade envoy, as George Freeman was until a couple of weeks ago when he was suspended, you do not have to obey the whip - and you can continue to keep your trade envoy role. But if you're in the Labour Party and you're a trade envoy, you do have to obey the whip. And it's just one of those mad inconsistencies where if you're in another party, you can keep your trade envoy role, if you're in the governing party, you can't. That just doesn't make sense at all. So there are my five reasons why I'm completely confused.
Telegraph
a day ago
- Politics
- Telegraph
Starmer suspends Labour MPs after welfare rebellion
Sir Keir Starmer is to suspend at least three rebellious Labour MPs from the party, two weeks after he suffered the biggest revolt of his premiership. One Labour MP told The Telegraph that some Left-wing backbenchers had been summoned to see the Chief Whip on Wednesday afternoon. The disciplinary meetings appear to be an attempt by the Prime Minister to stamp his authority on the party after he faced a rebellion of 49 MPs over his welfare reforms. A source told The Times that some MPs would be suspended for 'persistent k---headery' and rebelling against Downing Street. But one Left-wing MP said: 'It doesn't look good for [Sir Keir] that he's having to do this.'
The Independent
a day ago
- Politics
- The Independent
Starmer pressed over UK sanctions against Israel for war crimes targeting Palestinian children
Sir Keir Starmer has been grilled by a Labour MP over whether the government will impose sanctions on Israel to 'stop the genocide'. Speaking to the prime minister from the Commons on Wednesday (16 July), Imran Hussain said that Israel is committing 'war crimes' by 'killing Palestinian children as they queue for food'. 'Our government quite rightly imposes thousands of sanctions on Russia for its war crimes in Ukraine. How many more horrors must be witnessed before the prime minister acts with the same scale of sanctions against Israel to stop this genocide?,' the Bradford MP said. Sir Keir responded by saying he is 'appalled' by scenes in Gaza and said investigations into reports of civilians being killed must be 'transparently' carried out.
Telegraph
5 days ago
- Business
- Telegraph
Revealed: the full, devastating impact of Labour's VAT raid on private schools
Last summer Sir Keir Starmer made two promises to schoolchildren. The first was a father's promise that his son's education would not be disrupted if he became prime minister. The second was a commitment to levy 20pc VAT on private school fees 'as soon as it can be done' if Labour won the general election. He kept both promises. But while one child was able to complete their schooling unaffected by the new Labour Government, for thousands of private school children it has been a different story. At least 44 private schools have announced their closure as a result of the VAT raid, disrupting the education of almost 6,000 children. Many have entered the state sector, eroding the revenue the Government hopes to raise. All have had their lives upended as a result of Labour's education tax. Six months on since the policy was formally introduced on January 1, critics say all of their worst fears have become reality. Plans to hire 6,500 new state school teachers with the revenue raised from the levy have been watered down. School fees appear to have risen higher than Treasury officials expected, leading to a greater exodus of pupils into the state sector. All of this has raised doubts about whether the policy will really raise the promised £1.7bn by 2030. As head teachers and parents come to the end of the first school year where VAT has been applied to fees, Telegraph Money has assessed the impact of the tax raid so far. Exodus of 16,000 pupils Labour ministers have remained resolute that the VAT levy would not lead to an exodus of private school pupils into the state sector. The Treasury's impact assessment in October 2024 forecast 3,000 pupils would leave across the school year, but this prediction seems to have been a gross underestimate. Last month, the Department for Education revealed that private school pupil numbers fell by more than 11,000 in England following Labour's VAT raid on fees. The comparison looked at overall pupil numbers in January compared with the same point last year. The net exodus of 11,000 pupils – equivalent to one in 50 pupils – masks the true severity because of a slight increase in pupils joining specialist schools. In mainstream independent schools, around 16,000 pupils left. If these pupils were paying average day school fees of £22,146 a year, it equates to a £70m loss in revenue for the Treasury. This estimate would grow significantly if those same pupils joined state schools, which cost the Government around £8,000 a year per child in funding. Tim Barrow, 42, a small business owner from Hertfordshire, is one parent who has decided to remove two of his children from private schools as a result of the VAT raid. He says: 'All this policy has done is target middle-income families, those who have made considerable sacrifices to provide the best education for their children. Those who, frankly, have no margin left to play with. 'And in our situation, it has resulted in two additional places at our local primary school now occupied by my boys. It didn't need to happen. Two other families have lost access to those places and the Government receives no additional tax revenue for my two children.' At least 44 schools close their doors Across the country, private schools have been forced to close as a result of the levy, with many also citing the rises in National Insurance and minimum wage in April as contributing factors. The Telegraph has identified 44 schools that have closed or are set to close as a result of the VAT levy. Dozens more have closed in the past six months but these schools have not attributed their closures to the tax policy. Closures have predominantly taken place at schools charging lower fees, where parents are more price sensitive. St Joseph's Preparatory School, a Catholic school in Stoke-on-Trent that charged £10,245 per year, was forced to close on December 31. Its former headmistress Roisin Maguire said the policy has priced out 'working class' families from private education. She says: 'I'd love to have taken Bridget Phillipson into St Joseph's and said this is a school with one of the lowest fees, these parents are the people who work extra shifts at the hospital in order to afford this because their child has high needs. '[Ms Phillipson] has in her mind Eton and Harrow when she thinks of independent schools, but that's not the picture on the ground of schools who are affected by this.' Historic VAT claims While smaller, more affordable schools have closed, some schools such as Eton and Harrow, counter-intuitively, can make large retrospective claims. These schools are able to recover historic VAT they paid on capital expenditure including buildings and land acquisition over the past 10 years. The Telegraph previously estimated Eton would be able to reclaim around £4.8m from the Treasury based on the school's annual financial statements over the past four years. Prior to the introduction of VAT on fees, schools would not have been able to claim back costs. Labour MP Rachael Maskell accused her own party of creating further inequalities as a result, but it's a point that the majority of the public seem unaware of. A poll last week for stockbroker AJ Bell found 45pc of the public supported adding VAT to private school fees compared to 23pc who opposed the measure. A further 31pc were undecided. Tom Dawson, headmaster at Sunningdale School, a small boys prep school in Surrey, admits there remains a sense of negativity towards the sector from the wider public. 'There is a misconception that they are only available to the super wealthy. That isn't the case, or at least that wasn't the case [before the introduction of VAT].' He says the impact of the policy is already having a 'devastating effect'. He adds: 'We have had schools local to us close down, so our pupil roll for September is very healthy. Where there is less provision, the schools that are able to survive are picking up pupils for the moment. 'But I think we are [only] seeing the first wave and I think it's going to carry on hurting.' The '6,500 new teachers' claim All of this pain is justified, according to the Government, because it will help fund 6,500 new state school teachers in key subjects, according to Labour's manifesto. However, that claim, which appeared prominently on posters and leaflets, is unlikely to bear out. The first crack in the armour came after The Telegraph revealed the funds had not been ring-fenced to support state schools, despite Rachel Reeves saying 'every penny' would be spent on state schools. Since then, Sir Keir has said the money will be used to fund housebuilding targets, raising further doubts about what the policy is for. What is clear is that the target has been rephrased so that these teachers will no longer necessarily be 'new' or teach 'key subjects' and the pledge will omit primary school teachers. Emma Hollis, the chief executive of the National Association of School-Based Teacher Trainers (NASBTT), said the change 'fundamentally shifts the goalposts'. Nicky Hardy, the chairman of governors at a Catholic state school in Reading, says: 'Despite the policy being presented as a way to level the playing field between sectors, there is growing uncertainty about where the VAT revenue is actually going. 'Recent signals suggest the funds are now being redirected into wider public services, such as housing, rather than directly reinvested in education. If the intention was to improve outcomes for children in state schools, we are yet to see any evidence of that.' MPs from all parties have also criticised the pledge, with Parliament's public accounts committee claiming the Government 'lacks a coherent plan' on how it is going to recruit the teachers. Doubts over how much the tax raid will raise Six months on from its introduction, the biggest question mark hanging over Labour's VAT raid is whether it truly will raise £1.7bn. Between January and April, the policy was forecast to raise £450m but whether this target has been reached won't be known until later in the year. There are warning signs that the Treasury will struggle to reach its ambitious target. Its assumption that the policy will raise £1.5bn next year, rising to £1.7bn by 2029-30 is largely dependent on how many pupils move to the state sector. Students fleeing private schools hits the Treasury twice, both in terms of the loss of VAT revenue and the money it then has to spend on an additional state school space. The Treasury has calculated that 35,000 pupils will leave private schools over the course of the parliament, based on an assumption that school fees would rise by 10pc on average as a result of the VAT levy. Analysis by The Telegraph found fees rose by 14pc in January and they are set to rise further this coming September, with fees up 17pc compared with a year ago. Dawson is one of many head teachers who think the sums don't add up. 'I really don't feel the numbers add up at all,' he says. 'The costs that are going to be placed on state schools in my opinion are going to wipe out any gain [the Treasury] think it's going to make. It's not going to lead to increased investment in the state sector because the money isn't there. 'I think it's a policy decision more than an economic decision.' A government spokesman said: 'Ending tax breaks for private schools will raise £1.8bn a year by 2029-30 and help to recruit and retain an additional 6,500 teachers and raise school standards, supporting the 94pc of children in state schools to achieve and thrive.' 'This is a loss. Girls are thriving here' The stage at Queen Margaret's school in York was alive with music and laughter last week as girls danced and sang, writes Natasha Leake. Their performance of 'The Fun Song', the school's long-standing inter-house competition, was more than just a joyful display – it was a poignant farewell. Just days later, the top all-girls boarding school closed its doors forever. It came following a sudden announcement in June that financial pressures, exacerbated by Labour's introduction of VAT on school fees, had forced its closure. 'I sat at the back, and I just had one of those moments of real sadness,' says head teacher Nicola Dudley, two days before the school closed forever on July 5. 'Looking at the girls on stage, they were brilliant. They were having so much fun… They were singing and dancing their hearts out without any inhibitions. And I think that is just the nature of a small all-girls school. I thought, this is a loss; these girls really are thriving here.' Dudley is speaking on the same day that sports day takes place at the school for the last time. After her appointment in September 2024, just 10 months ago, she had hoped to guide the school with renewed energy and passion for all-girls education, which she herself had experienced growing up. 'There is a real feeling of sadness,' she says. 'It's grieving for the loss of a community that's meant so much to so many people, and that's really hard.' Founded in 1901, Queen Margaret's school is set in the idyllic countryside of Escrick Park in Yorkshire. Next year would have marked its 125th anniversary. Described in the Good Schools Guide as 'small but perfectly formed', Queen Margaret's had weathered two world wars, three relocations and 14 head teachers, but could not survive the latest round of financial challenges. 'We, like many independent schools, have been unable to withstand mounting financial pressures following the introduction of VAT on school fees,' the governing body said in their June statement. They also pointed to school numbers falling so much they were 'below the viable level required to keep the school open beyond the current academic year'. One teacher at the school, who asked not to be named, thinks the girls will never find the level of teaching which existed at Queen Margaret's again. 'I remember one student wanted to learn how to play the bagpipes, so the music department got a bagpipes tutor in,' he says, adding: 'We had two Ukrainian girls on full scholarships because of the war in Ukraine.' And for the local economy, the impact of the school's closure is devastating. 'It is easily the biggest employer in this village,' he adds. 'It's like a village disappearing, because of all the gardeners, all the cleaners, all the chefs, all the teachers.' Following the June 13 announcement of the school's closure, waves of disbelief permeated the school community. 'It was a big shock to the teachers, definitely to the girls,' the teacher reflects. 'They were absolutely devastated… a lot of them were crying because they have made lots of friends… nobody likes change, they have to find a new school within weeks.' Further afield, Old Margretian WhatsApp group chats have been buzzing furiously, as alumni have been gathering to discuss the school's closure but also to reminisce about better times. Annabel Sampson, now features editor at Tatler magazine, attended the school from 2000 to 2008. 'It was such a happy, hilarious time,' she remembers. 'An all-girls boarding school in the middle of Yorkshire; we were all so wild and free... it was all about who had the scruffiest ponytail. Everyone was authentically themselves, and that was really celebrated.' Would she ever have imagined it would close one day? 'Definitely not,' she says. 'If someone had said that in 20 years the school would close, you would have said 'that's a joke'. Plus, while I was there new facilities were being developed – a new theatre, and a chapel, so it felt forward-looking.' Back in the head teacher's office, Dudley reflects on the school's closure. No one seems to know what will happen to the school buildings, which will stand empty after it closes and the administrators arrive. 'I find it easiest not to think about what might happen to it because I just want to imagine it as it is,' says Dudley. 'Once people leave the school, the heart has gone.'
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Starmer ‘accepts invite' to visit Trump during expected trip to Scotland
Sir Keir Starmer has accepted an invitation to visit Donald Trump during the US president's expected trip to Scotland this month, according to sources. Details, including a specific date, are still being finalised, the source familiar with the plans, who was not authorised to speak publicly, told Reuters on Thursday. Scottish police said on Wednesday that they were preparing for a possible visit by Mr Trump to Scotland later this month, which would mark his first visit to Britain since the US election last year. The White House had no immediate comment on the report. The British embassy declined to comment. Mr Trump and Sir Keir have developed a warm relationship in recent months, and last month signed a framework trade deal on the sidelines of a G7 meeting that formally lowered some US tariffs on imports from Britain. The deal came after the British prime minister visited the White House in February for a friendly encounter that included an invitation from King Charles for a future state visit, which Mr Trump accepted. UK media this week reported that Mr Trump would visit his golf clubs in Scotland later this month, though a final date is yet to be confirmed. Sky News said he would visit his Turnberry and Aberdeenshire golf courses. The cost of policing a potential visit by the US president will be "considerable", a senior Police Scotland officer said as the force looks to secure extra funding. The visit will require substantial policing resources and likely units to be called in from elsewhere in the UK. Deputy Chief Constable Alan Speirs told the PA news agency on Thursday that Police Scotland will be discussing costs with the Scottish and UK Governments. The last time Mr Trump came to Scotland – in between his two terms as US president – he was met with substantial protests. Mr Speirs said he was confident the force would be able to deal with any protests, urging those who would want to demonstrate to "do it in a fair and reasonable way and within the realms of the law". A Scottish government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government has been working collaboratively with the UK Government to support Police Scotland's planning for a potential visit to Scotland by the President of the United States.' Additonal reporting by Reuters
